G.L.Piggy [at] gmail.com
Recent Comments
- dan on The guns that killed Tamerlan Tsarnaev weren’t illegal
- dan on The guns that killed Tamerlan Tsarnaev weren’t illegal
- Woodshed_rabbit on This is not The Jungle
- Woodshed_rabbit on This is not The Jungle
- Woodshed_rabbit on This is not The Jungle
- peterike on The guns that killed Tamerlan Tsarnaev weren’t illegal
GLP Approved
- Captain Capitalism
- Dalrock
- Dennis Mangan
- Econ Log
- Elusive Wapiti
- Foseti
- Hawaiian Libertarian
- HBD Bibliography
- Heartiste
- Lion of the Blogosphere
- Marginal Revolution
- Matt Forney
- Randall Parker
- Razib Khan
- Reihan Salam
- Roosh V
- Simon Grey
- SOBL
- Steve Sailer
- The Last Psychiatrist
- The Spearhead
- Thrasymachus
- Ulysses
- Vox Day
Tweet Tweet
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Did you learn nothing from Ryan Holiday? Why link to business insider?
That “banker chick” post is unreadable. It takes a good premise and messes it up with plain old bad writing. Not exactly “The Happy Hooker.”
touche. but i generally try to avoid the pieces there and at other sites that make spurious accusations about individuals and businesses. however, they do also provide linkage to stories that i and others who read this blog might find interesting. since dating and sexuality is a big topic here and since i’ve covered stories about people becoming outraged at men who compile excel spreadsheets tracking their dates, i figured a post about a woman who ranks wall street men is germane to this blog. the internet is an evil beast. everyone is competing for clicks which essentially means they are competing for individuals’ time. as a blogger (middleman) i stake my reputation on providing good and interesting links to the people who read this blog. i can’t say that i’m going to consistently adhere to holiday’s arguments, but for the time being they provide me with information on how the business works and how to look for the right types of stories to avoid. and it’s not about just avoiding business insider/gawker/drudge altogether; it’s about picking out what’s good and what’s bad on those sites.
A man can be platonic friends with a woman who is very attractive as long as there is a mitigating factor that makes her unavailable, such as her being married or being his sister. Of course, you’re not likely to be in a situation where you spend extensive time socializing alone with other men’s wives so this first one is rare in practice, but it could conceivably happen if you, say, work together or something.
I wouldn’t change a thing about that Italian girl: http://www.ranker.com/pics/N1000240262/marta-menegatti-athletes-photo-u1
Compare that with the manjaws that beat her to submission:
http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/images/photos/001/825/887/hi-res-149576134_crop_exact.jpg?w=650&h=440&q=75
Just change your name to morehackthandrudgeandbreitbart.com with 1/1,000,000th the site hits, Weak Dick.
like my actual name? i don’t think i can legally change my name to a url. they’d probably make me put http:// in front of it anyway.
here’s some news….
http://www.metalsucks.net/tag/end-apathy/
@ve
Haha oh wow, I totally agree.
On link #4, the second sentence. It should be womAn, not women.