Reading the Salon take-down of Colin Flaherty’s book “White Girl Bleeds A Lot”, I came across a Buzzfeed piece which posted a screencap and a link to my piece from the Daily Caller about the black-on-white attack in Mobile, Alabama.
Both the Salon piece and the Buzzfeed piece make the same argument that “racist” conservatives like Flaherty and, I guess, myself (and plenty of others) are making much ado about nothing. From Buzzfeed:
As the Trayvon case has died down, the Caller has continued to follow the race wars with combative coverage, recently publishing an interview with the sister of an assault victim in Mobile, Ala. who claimed a black “mob” attacked him after he tried to stop a robbery.
Stories like these have plenty of detractors, who say they appeal to the worst instincts of their white audience. Curtis Lawrence, diversity chairman for the Society of Professional Journalists, said best practices generally dictate that news outlets should only identify a criminal suspect’s race when there’s evidence suggesting it was a factor in the crime — otherwise, he said, they run the risk of recklessly affirming negative racial stereotypes.
Nevermind that the Mobile beating was newsworthy because one of the mob participants made a reference to “justice for Trayvon.” That’s why the piece was picked up; it hit a vein on a very prominent news story. The author of the BF post eludes that. And there were also the reports that the kids that the white man, Matthew Owens, was scolding were using racial epithets at him before the beating occurred.
Now I’ll admit up front that much of white conservative angst over black-on-white attacks is not backed by police statistics (I’m talking about these random street-level assaults, not murder and rape). That immediately damages the argument that there is some sort of widespread problem with interracial attack. But white men are communicating from their own experience. Either they’ve been attacked themselves, know someone who has been attacked, or understand that there are quite a few areas of town or night spots that they couldn’t venture through without greatly increasing the odds that they’ll be attacked. Ask Matt Yglesias.
As for white conservatives’ belief that many of these random attacks are racially motivated – there are no reported examples that I can think of of random black men being blindsided by groups of black kids. Black studies professors make a big deal about “othering”. Blacks are treated poorly by whites because they are considered “the other”. That’s an unspoken form of racism to black studies types. Blacks randomly attacking whites should be seen as an example of “othering”. Where whites are outnumbered and/or outsiders, they become prime targets for tacitly racially-motivated attacks. Even if the attacking blacks aren’t screaming out “cracker” as they kick a white guy in the face, they are most certainly acting on a deep-seated hatred of white men.
Another aspect is that many whites don’t report their attacks. And when they do they are likely to avoid attributing either the race of their attackers or their motivations. Recently I tracked down a kid who was attacked along with two other white friends by a group of up to 100 blacks. That attack occurred alongside a few others that same weekend and in the same park in Portland. I found the kid and emailed him. His Facebook page showed that he was an Obama supporter and a social justice boy scout. He responded to my inquiry: “I don’t really want to get involved in any of the media hype about this. Have a nice day.”
All of the rhetoric aside, there have been hundreds of random black-on-white attacks in the news over the past few years – a time span during which news of these types of attacks are brought to light through the internet, unlike the past where they were underreported even more than they are now. There is something newsworthy in this trend – this pattern. And someone has to report on it.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Colin Flaherty’s book title “White Girl Bleed a Lot” (citing a black female accomplice in a violent attack on a white woman) is genius in its superego-bypassing raw simplicity.
It hits white girls at at the epicenter of their fears: diversity is creepy and scary. Also, how do you disconnect the white woman from her anti-racist programming? Through her latent fear of the larger black woman.
Flaherty’s meme will not go away.
I worked bar security for over a decade starting as a teen. Blacks were well know to attack in groups and to target Whites. It was common knowledge in the industry. My father is a retired Warden even Black prison guards will admit how racists blacks are and they will attack Whites unprovoked. Ask the LEOs and you will hear the same thing.
Black behavior is very well known to those who want to know. Liberals choose not to know anything that disrupts their narrative.
Hmmm. Email the kid again. Tell him you know something about the suspects. There’s a pattern that’s been occuring whenever a government becomes “run for blacks” like BRA. First showed itself in Zimbabwe. Then the farm attacks in South Africa which have also been vastly underreported. Obama’s elected and negro mob attacks explode in the US. You tell the guy you know why these attacks are occuring and what he needs to do to protect himself.
If he still doesn’t want to get involved, he’s a suicidal liberal. He doesn’t want to live on Earth. White nationalism is life, multiculturalism is death for his race.
Race is a factor in the black mob attacks, but maybe not in the way that everyone thinks.
These black mobs are attacking whites because they know that whites will only call the police if attacked. Other blacks will not call the police if attacked, but will instead collect family members from around the area and immediately retaliate. They’re getting off on the idea of being able to act with impunity.
If you’re ever lived in a majority or near-majority black area, the first thinkg you’ll notice is that blacks NEVER call the police or cooperate with any poice investigation. That neighbor that says HI to you every more will not step forth and tell the police what they know even if they have personal knowledge of who broke in an stole your xbox and ransacked your place while you were at work.
It’s really just a case of blacks being blacks – uncivilized, violent, shameless, pitiless and having short time horizons.
The Left are shitting their pants over Whites being made aware of the low-intensity race war against them.
If Flaherty’s book is so “dumb” (incisive analysis there, Pareene, you fat cocksucker), then why does Salon of all places feel obliged to review it?
The race war meme is spreading, and liberals are scared to death.
The author of the BF post eludes that.
I think you mean “elides.”
Whites being made aware of the low-intensity race war against them
You think it is low-intensity? I don’t think so.
It’s not just whites that they hate.
They also seem to hate defenceless, retarded asians.
Of course the left has to downplay these racially motivated attacks. After all, they are playing with fire.
They do not want the notion that whites are under racial and racists attack to go viral and spread to a large proportion of whites. If that happens, whites will close ranks …
The larger point (among radical blacks) is that even if this is true, it’s okay: it’s justice.
Among whites, were this attitude to become widely known, then some tiny percentage would agree, out of some self-annihilistic sense of guilt, but most would still refuse to believe they’d just heard a blavk person say it – or would do the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” thing and just shut up. Nothing can interrupt the love-in, even when the other guy decides it’s time for a target-in and a beat-em-up-in.
So: Deny, deny, deny, then justify.
Stand still, don’t make any suddenlmovements, and try not to scare those chickens coming home to roost!
White people have been beating up, lynching, burning at the stake, and worse to black people for centuries…this is just the results of Karma…ain’t it a bitch?
Angry white people all of sudden? Hahahaha, funeee. People of Color have been dealing with savage whites for more than 400 years. Now, you know how they feel. They’ve been frustrated with white bigots/racists/cowards for sooooooo much longer. How about now, you take your own advice: Stop playing the race card… and of course my all time favorite, “get over it”. Don’t like the feeling with the shoe is on the other foot ey?
Well of course the truth would come out if the violence was racially reversed.
White violence toward blacks = racism and you are “in denial” if you don’t recognize it.
Black violence toward Whites = don’t go there and if you do you are an “obsessed racist” if you notice it.
Make of it what you will:
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/19294984/teens-raped-robbed-pizza-deliverer-police
http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20120621/ARTICLES/120629929/1177?Title=Five-facing-charges-for-murder-of-delivery-driver&tc=ar
http://mylifeofcrime.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/serial-killer-coral-eugene-watts-the-sunday-morning-slasher/
“People of Color have been dealing with savage whites for more than 400 years. ”
People of Color have been dealing with civilizing whites for more than 400 years and People of Color are still not civilized.
doofus troll:
“this is just the results of Karma…ain’t it a bitch?”
which side do you think would win in an all-out, organized race war? you may reference historical examples to bolster your case.
Black people are raised to hate and envy white people. Beside gossip and sports, race is the most prominent topic amongst black people. It’s used to unite black people. Race is something black people always talk about, go look on any black youtube page and you will see videos on racial topics. They are not afraid to show their faces and talk in the most explicit manner on race because that’s normal in the black community. Believe it or not but a lot of the hate comes from the way white people look compared to black people. Many black people don’t like their natural appearance of dark skin, afro-textured hair, broad nose, big nostrils, recessed chin, brown eyes, black hair, big forehead, and bucked teeth. Deep feelings of envy surface when black people compare their appearance with white people. Other racial groups don’t generate the extreme feelings black people get with white people because they are not attractive. Black people are primed to be hostile toward white people. It doesn’t have to do with the past as black people would like you to believe. If black people really cared about what happened to black people in the past they would invest with their own money and time into preserving that history. But they don’t. White and Jewish people are the ones preserving black history through funding, building and studying. Even organ donation is a racial issue amongst black people. Besides the lack of trust amongst black people which leads to the lack of charity, the biggest reason black people don’t donate organs is because of the rare chance the organs can be given to white people.
Hundreds of years ago, Inuit would pretend to be starving and enter European settlements on Greenland to ask for food. Non-white people have figured out to get ahead in white society you have to look pathetic and complain. Look pathetic and complain are the keys to gaining resources from white people. This is why Jews always bring up the Holocaust and pogroms while at the same time being the most successful group within white society and why East Asians are now admonishing people for portraying them as successful.
Alex Pareen, when are you going to take a walk through your local black area at night? Take the walk (on a routine basis) or you’re a lying racist and hypocrite. I mean, if all this is fake and statistically insignificant, you shouldn’t have a problem taking the walk.
There would be even more white victims if whole sections of the nation hadn’t already been ethnically cleansed of whites, not by blacks but by white-hating leftists who use blacks as stormtroopers. You can’t leave that out of “statistics.”
Black people ae envious of white people?
Then why do white girls crave Black Men?
“which side do you think would win in an all-out, organized race war? you may reference historical examples to bolster your case.”
Blacks would beat up on white boys like they do everyday
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Congo, Detoit, Atlanta, Haiti. When the races clash the Black Man run it.
In what other realm do the mainstream media work so hard to keep the facts *from* the public? In Washington Post crime coverage it has become a running joke among readers: if the race of the offender is omitted, readers can be almost certain the offender is black (thus the paper’s policy has the perverse effect of *amplifying* reader assumptions about black violence, not reducing them). When the victim is black (or gay) and the offender is not, you can be pretty sure the article will be about a “hate crime.” And when the crime is a sexual assault, you can bank on editors being especially studious about redacting race from police and witness accounts—even when the offender is still at large! How’s that for a public service?
While they are loathe to publish their editorial guidelines on these matters, writers and editors will sometimes confirm privately that these are, in fact, the formal written policy of the newspaper.
Thus we should be thankful for the sheer intellectual courage of writers like Flaherty.
I understand. You people are afraid of the changing demographics. You’re afraid of being profiled because you’re white, etc. But look at it this way. This country doesn’t belong to us, just because we’re white. Many People of Color can trace their ancestry as far back as this country’s inception.
To prepare yourself for the “onslaught,” try educating yourself. Read books by black authors or Asian authors. Talk to people of color that you may see regularly, say, on the bus or at the grocery store. Learn to speak Spanish. Instead of being part of the fearful minority, clinging to guns and stereotypes, get to know your neighbors and expand your horizons.
poor, poor white people in this country, suffering such horrific discrimination, so downtrodden to the point where they only control nearly every corporate boardroom in the nation, as well as Congress and the Supreme Court.
“Blacks would beat up on white boys like they do everyday
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Congo, Detoit, Atlanta, Haiti. When the races clash the Black Man run it.’
Moron. If the “Black man run” it for real…there wouldn’t have even been a “South Africa”, “Zimbabwe”, or “Congo”…all places that were conceded by the people that supposedly were “run”. Oh yeah, they really “ran it” when they were getting pwned by the British, Dutch, Belgians (laugh!) and even the French back in the day…who got tired of owning it and just let go. Even at that the only way they “run it” is with numerical superiority. 6:1, 8:1, 10:1 or more.
“Even at that the only way they “run it” is with numerical superiority. 6:1, 8:1, 10:1 or more.”
That is how the demographics are trending!
Eat it!
“That is how the demographics are trending!”
Not even close to reality…at least certainly not for Blacks. Unless you mean 8:1 against.
People of Color have tons of children
white people do not have children
white women are increasingly having the children of Men of Color
Ah…so now we have moved the Goalposts from “Blacks” to “People of Color”??? Nice try.
Black women are increasingly having the children of Men of Colorlessness(?) Men of Transparency(??) Men of Blind-Cavefish-ish-ness(???) Neither group having a major demographic impact.
Sounds as if You would like to have the children of Men of Color, if that were physically possible for you…or if Not: that you would at least like to go through the Motions of same with Men of Color.
“Curtis Lawrence, diversity chairman for the Society of Professional Journalists, said best practices generally dictate that news outlets should only identify a criminal suspect’s race when there’s evidence suggesting it was a factor in the crime — otherwise, he said, they run the risk of recklessly affirming negative racial stereotypes.”
The newspapers are disingenous on this point. If groups of white kids were randomly attacking black and asian men, I have no doub tthat their race and the victim’s race would be cited in every article on the presumption that race was a factor in the attack.
doofus troll:
“Blacks would beat up on white boys like they do everyday”
i wrote “organized” race war.
“South Africa, Zimbabwe, Congo, Detoit, Atlanta, Haiti. When the races clash the Black Man run it.”
…into the ground.
Both the “black” and “white” liberationist WILL SEEK to “liberate” from “white Supremacy” BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
To be “liberated” is to step outside of and destroy “white Supremacy.” This goes for ALL the deviant liberationist movements (black, progressive, homosexual, dyke, jihadist, la raza, jewish orthodox or leftist, etc).
And so this is where all conversation starts with the “black” liberationist and his self-annihilating “white” liberal whipping boy.
One cannot even be a “black man” or a “white liberal” UNLESS he holds this belief true to heart.
The “black man” CANNOT escape “white Supremacy” without the total annihilation of the “white man” including ALL “white” liberals. This is the fundamental belief of the “black man.” It explains everything he does that is even minutely important to “us.”
To even remotely acknowledge that one may be able to escape “white Supremacy” as a “black man” is treated with such contempt and scorn as to insure that none ever broach the subject.
OTOH, the “white” liberal CAN escape “white Supremacy” and does so through SELF-annihilating, spiritually (Supremacy doesn’t exist), intellectually (“white man” is a social construct) and finally, physically (de facto homo). In this formulation, “black” liberationists are facilitators in the “white” liberal’s self-annihilation. The “black man” HELPS the poor lil’ “white” boy gain LIBERATION through self-annihilation!!!!
@ anti-racist, you sir are a fine troll. not skilled but persistent..
“anti-racist 08/17/2012 at 10:45 am
White people have been beating up, lynching, burning at the stake, and worse to black people for centuries…this is just the results of Karma…ain’t it a bitch?”
So, if as you point out, the current trend of racism and violence directed at White people is the result of karma. I must admit this very well may be true. But if it is, then the horrible events that have happened in the history of Blacks must also been the result of “karma”. So by your logic they got what they deserved too, eh? But then that would be silly Karma is based on an individuals actions, ya know “content of character”,not whole races. So let us judge those who behave like savages, as savages, and deal with them accordingly.
one may also point out that in the concept of karma, a person can atone for past misdeeds by doing “good”. I have yet to see any aid/preference programs put in place by the people who “control nearly every corporate boardroom in the nation, as well as Congress and the Supreme Court”, that aren’t specifically targeted at non-whites. so remind me again whom is currently treating whom badly. and by currently i mean alive today…
On a side note. In my life i have been in my share of fights. In that time i have never had a fight with a single Black person, its always been 2-3 or more. Even back in the 80′s it wasn’t uncommon for white guys to comment that blacks always seem to attack/fight in groups against single targets/opponents.
Blacks owe their very existence to the white man feeding them. One day the feeding will stop. Homo Africanus will once again be a jungle curiosity or a beast of burden.
The troll knows that the good times are coming to an end. We’re at peak-Negro.
The whole point of this discussion is how “liberals” downplay black-on-white violence.
And WHY they downplay it?
The explanation is a simple one. Liberals in the media (read: liberal “gentiles” + leftist jews + homosexuals and dykes) WANT TO DESTROY “white Supremacy” in totality. The “black man,” whose entire identity is based on the belief that he MUST “liberate” from “white Supremacy” by any means necessary, is just the most logical and ruthless facilitator in this self-annihilating scheme. Self-annihilation CREATES a “default elite.” There are vast amounts of liberal eggs in need of breaking and the Liberal media can always point to “white Supremacy” as an exacerbator to the racial strife. This is exactly the game being played. There simply will be no mass genocide of the “black man” in America by “white Supremacy.” The very fact that this “genocide of the black man by white Supremacy” is another core belief of the “black man” is what makes him that much more odious. To take the same mindset that “genocide of white man” is at the hands of such and such is to miss the bigger point. “White” liberals can only ESCAPE genuine “white Supremacy” through SELF-annihilation and not as facilitators to the “white man’s” murder.
“We” may be at peak-negro, but the mass of self-annihilating “white” liberal isn’t about to acknowledge the killing spree that they consciously and subconsciously DESIRE as endpoint liberalism. “White” liberals seek Final Liberation. In a finite world this means they seek self-annihilation. “We” are seeking separation from all these self-annihilators.
“South Africa, Zimbabwe, Congo, Detoit, Atlanta, Haiti. When the races clash the Black Man run it.”
LOL The white man says take it. And LOL again at the notion of blacks and illegals/their offspring teaming up in a race war. I’ve lived around Austin, TX my whole life so I’ve known tons of Mexicans. Blacks and Hispanics almost completely segregate themselves here; when they don’t the low classes fight just like in L.A. The only people who dislike blacks more than the Mexicans are the east Asians. If they ever do get the chance to dominate whites they won’t be raising the hands of the blacks along with them. Although they can team up to vote to take the white mans money…until it runs out.
“white women are increasingly having the children of Men of Color”
Most of the time when I see interracial couples and the woman is white, the man is black and she’s obviously a low-IQ prole. She’s usually a big, fat, ugly, lard-ass pigwoman to boot. If whites continue to dysgenically breed, I’d prefer that they do so interracially.
One trend that I’ve noticed over the past ten years is that some extremely liberal SWPL women will fuck a black man or two when they’re in their 20s in an attempt to raise their social status by showing their friends how incredibly tolerant they are. They rarely date these men, though, and if they do, it’s not for more than a week or two. “I have the urge to have a brutha all up in me . . . my own little personal form of reparations.” These cunts are almost invariably feminists and would be disgusted with any white man who seeks out a perfunctory Asian fuck.
@anti-racist: “Blacks would beat up on white boys like they do everyday.” Yea, when it’s six on one. Or 90-year old grandmothers.
Heh…either @anti-racist is Takimag’s favorite troll “rudeboi” or a very good impersonator thereof.
Check out his scintillating oeuvre here…
http://disqus.com/rudeboi/
I had a 20-year old black male try to get tough with me the other day, outside the library of all places (guess he needed to use the free Internet). I was dressed in slacks & collared shirt on my lunch break from work. I said “Hi” to a black female that I recognized who was walking with the “tough guy” (yea, I know, bad move). He went ballistic in a millisecond, screaming and making wild & aggressive gestures toward me (basically, a “chimp out”). I kept walking directly toward him from about 40 feet away w/ my eyes directly locked on him. He backed down like the pussy that he his, got in the passenger side of the girl’s car and they drove away while I made a hand gesture (yea, I know, another bad move).
Now, I’m probably fortunate that it didn’t escalate further due to it likely getting broke up by the police (and messing up my clothes), and I might not have made it back to work that day, and would have had a lot of explaining to do, or even suffered legal & job troubles. I’m 6 feet 160 lbs, very fit, and this guy was my size, though many years younger, but since it was one on one and I didn’t back down, his fear came out.
Blacks almost always only attack in packs. But, of course, one must always be aware of your surroundings and avoid stupid people and stupid places.
From Pareene’s piece: “But this epidemic of racial crime isn’t an epidemic. It’s barely a blip. According to the FBI, there were 575 crimes motivated by anti-white bias in 2010, nationwide. There were 545 anti-white crimes in 2009 and 716 in 2008. There were more than 2,000 crimes motivated by anti-black bias in each one of those years.”
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I’ve yet to read about a single “youth” who was arrested for being part of a flash mob in Philadelphia who’s been charged with a hate crime, even if the attacker(s) used anti-white slurs against their victim(s).
The most recent example that comes to mind:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/Teens-in-cab-attack-will-not-be-charged-with-hate-crimes.html
Racially motivated violence (especially when it’s random) disgusts me no matter what the color of the perpetrator is, and I’d bet that a significant number of the 4,000 “hate” crimes that whites were charged with/arrested for in 2008 and 2009 were a result of a regular dispute (a bar fight, whatever) that turned violent where the white man won and used the evil “n-word” in anger when the guy he beat up was black.
If you’re white and get you into a fight with a black guy, win the fight, and utter the word “nigger,” chances are you’re getting charged with a hate crime. When the situation is reversed, the black guy is rarely charged with a hate crime no matter how many times he says “cracker” while beating a white man’s (or woman’s) face into the ground.
I know several white men who have been jumped by blacks. One of them lost several teeth and had a large gash in his lip. As far as I know, not one of them reported the crime.
Robert,
White women can be attracted to black men. Black men can be handsome, masculine and charming. Where black men are weak, is their collective ability to create a civilization any woman, with options, would want to live in. That’s why I think they need to show more gratitude to white men.
*collective inability
anti-racist says:
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Congo, Detoit, Atlanta, Haiti. When the races clash the Black Man run it.
Lets look at two events in Africa
Islandlwana, the first engagement between the British and the Zulus. The blacks had 20,000 men in the field. The British had less that 2,000 under arms. Of course, the British had guns which the Zulus did not. The British were destroyed, but it took a 10-to-1 ratio to do that.
Rorkes DriftBy now the blacks were armed. Here the Zulus had some 4,000 men against less that 200 British (including some men who were patients.). The Zulus lost. Pathetically. Against an effective force of around 154 men.
If that is your definition of the Black Man running it, bring it on. I am sure we whites will come out ahead.
The New Black Panther Party tell us what they would really like to do to whites
Spread the word.
The “diversity chairman for the Society of Professional Journalists” is worried about “recklessly affirming negative racial stereotypes.” Exemplary SWPL logic in its simultaneous employment of both argument from authority and appeal to consequences.
To the deranged overheated SWPL brain, this kind of argument is persuasive. To diversity professionals it’s ironclad. Imagine either one admitting there could ever be a case of non-reckless affirmation of negative stereotypes.
Anti-Racist again. His or her arguments (reads like a him, though) are so boilerplate, he’s got to be a racist sockpuppet. None of his arguments are either rational or logical; a child can pick them apart with ease. At best, they amount to careless taunts. He’s a hard-cre racist, an intelligent one, mimicking the behavior of a delusional academic-minded liberal white guy. He could also be black.
It’s really not worth responding to, except to clarify arguments. In that way, he does a great service.
I love anti-racist. He is so funny.
What he does not seem to realize is that enlightened white nationalism does not include people for simply being white. Only the right kind of white person is truly an ally in this struggle, while the wrong kind of white person can simply go to hell and be whatever cannon-fodder, bullet-stopper he chooses to be. I have no sympathy for liberal whites that are beaten, raped or killed by blacks. I have no sympathy for some Obama-supporting white kid in Portland. I would like nothing better than to see a Matt Yglesias become crippled after a black beating or to have heard that cunt from the Onion died from her injuries.
These are not examples of black-on-white violence. These are examples of black-on-”white” violence, where the scare quotes draw attention to qualifying exactly what kind of “white” person was beaten. These are mere statistics to warn the true white people, but not the tragedies deserving of anguish and sympathy. These types of “white” people are the enemies hidden in plain sight although they do concentrate in certain professions.
Here is some gun advice. In case anyone here is unaware, the Glock line of pistols feature polygonal rifling that cannot be ballistically matched. This means that bullets cannot be matched to a Glock. Furthermore, any firing pin or extractor tool marks can be destroyed making even shell casing analysis impossible.
The Glock is the perfect pistol against Negroid violence. With a few precautions, you can shoot one of the pavement apes or their DWL supporters and walk away from a scene confident the keystone cops cannot get you.
Just think- if it weren’t for blacks none of you in the US would have any reasonable concern about street crime. Burglaries maybe, MV accidents of course-but not street crime.
Only the right kind of white person is truly an ally in this struggle, while the wrong kind of white person can simply go to hell and be whatever cannon-fodder, bullet-stopper he chooses to be. I have no sympathy for liberal whites that are beaten, raped or killed by blacks. I have no sympathy for some Obama-supporting white kid in Portland. I would like nothing better than to see a Matt Yglesias become crippled after a black beating or to have heard that cunt from the Onion died from her injuries.
That’s way too harsh.
As whites, altruism is a part of who we are. No other race on the planet feels the same sense of altruism that we do. These liberals are merely operating on a sense of wanting to see others achieve what white civilization and people can achieve, and in their own minds they’ve twisted their understanding of reality to place the blame of NAM incompetence back on “institutional” or “systemic” racism.
Most white liberals of the Portland variety aren’t doing it out any of true sense of self-hate, they just see blacks at the eternal bottom of the socioeconomic barrel and they don’t want to believe the truly brutal truth that blacks just aren’t very well evolved for success in a modern Western country. And yes, it is a brutal truth.
As soon as our economy continues to go into the crapper over the next few decades, these whites will increasingly return to the fold.
There’s practically ZERO liberal whites in South Africa.
As a matter of fact, even the most zealous white liberal tends to swing back over to the right after getting married and having kids. For whites, having to actually pay significant taxes and worry about putting kids in a good school is a great way of exterminating the old liberal fantasies of youth. Thus, a bigger problem is probably the low white birth rate and overly late marriage.
Reading Alex’s article got me angry a few times, but for the most part I enjoyed hearing another viewpoint. His “you’re a wimp” tactic was kind of funny and exactly the one I’ve had used on me. He’s right, some people are paranoid. Talking opening and honestly about these things is certainly not going to make them more so. If anything, they can at least stop feeling like they understand things no one else does.
Camlost, well said about white liberals. But I wouldn’t worry too much about birthrates and such. They are dropping across the globe. There are more whites alive today than have ever lived. White children are born every minute.
And our problem today is not one of numbers, but one one of leadership, and the elite whites will certainly reverse their stance on race via recallibration, generational succession, or factional struggle. There are signs that this is already occurring.
Historically, one hundred white men have overcome thousands of non-whites. And with blacks, no effort at all is needed to defeat then: all we have to do is stop feeding them.
There’s practically ZERO liberal whites in South Africa.
The liberal elites like to have options and bolt-holes. They have no loyalty to the people they exploit, and when the going gets tough they bug out and leave the rest of us holding the bag and dealing with the shit they caused.
Remember that when it comes time to pull the trigger.
“There’s practically ZERO liberal whites in South Africa.”
Because they are so outnumbered. For instance, this is what will happen if you are white and go to prison in South Africa.
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/896211-businessman-tells-of-south-african-prison-rape-that-left-him-hiv-positive
Because they are so outnumbered.
Exactly.
And American whites will be outnumbered by 2040 or 2060 (and that’s best case scenario).
And American whites will be outnumbered by 2040 or 2060 (and that’s best case scenario).
For some reason, and without any supporting evidence, people think that current trends will continue for the next 20 or 40 years. What makes you think that Mexicans (who make up the greatest number of immigrants, will continue to want to come to the US in the same numbers over that time and that the mutual animosity between blacks and Mexicans will be unexploitable.
In South Africa, whites are outnumbered by blacks. Coloreds (Indians and mixed race people) are a minority who are probably better off cooperating with whites.
Don’t believe the propaganda put about by those who would have you give up.
Some ask: Why do they always attack in packs?
Because they lack agency. In much the same way, women feel compelled to assemble a gaggle of hens to perform the most trivial errand. They simply lack the agency which emerges from higher-cognitive functions and thus must rely on the “Agency of the Pack”.
Barring some massive die offs of already born babies white adults will be outnumbered by non-white adults in 20 or 40 years. This isn’t a projected “trend”, except the very strong “trend” of relatively low infant mortality in the 1st world.
Why whites are dying? Feminism. And Abortion.
Pingback: Linkage Is Good For You – Cypher’s Week | Society of Amateur Gentlemen
The reason we white women interbreed is that to have obviously white children in the inner city is a terrible thing. You are better off if you are mixed race. I grew up a pretty white girl in Oakland and I suffered tortures of the damned. I would never do it to my kids. Never. Having a brown complexion can only help them in the future. My Chinese-American co-worker saw pics of my daughters and said, “They look so ethnic!” One daughter is half Iranian and one is one quarter Sri Lankan, one quarter Hawaiian. My best friend growing up was a half lakota half Irish girl who looked like any ethnic group and blended in anywhere. It’s criminal to throw white, blond kids into a culture that hates them. I work with a cute German American girl, who looks like a St Pauli girl, and she hates being white. I always tell a story about a white blond woman from southern Illinois I used to belly dance with in North Beach San Francisco. I was concerned that stage lights would wash me out. I told her that I hoped I didn’t look too white on the stage. “Why honey,” she said proudly, we are white!”
doofus troll: “this is just the results of Karma…ain’t it a bitch?”
I guess slavery, drug addiction, crime, abuse, murder, disease and self hate is just the result of the black mans karma….aint it ….?