1. More liberal cat obsession, this time as a lame advertisement created by the city of Charlotte ahead of the DNC. (h/t Dain Fitzgerald)
2. Dating coach believes Bed, Bath, and Beyond is underrated in terms of places for men to pick up women. He also warns against the humblebrag as it is transparent.
3. Matt Lewis on dog whistling. Says that the purpose of coded language is for it to only play to members of the group, as when Obama used the Malcolm X-cribbed terms “hoodwinked” and “bamboozled”.
4. Though I’ve been guilty of mocking white trash, I consider myself an equal opportunity mocker. The same can’t be said for the prestige press whose double standard is showing. Let’s continue making fun of Honey Boo Boo and all that, but then let’s go scour the ghetto for a family of Precious’, put them on TV, and ridicule them as well.
5. More evidence supporting the Kevin Williamson “Alpha Romney” piece. Romney apparently snagged his wife Ann by asking her then boyfriend if he, Mitt, could drive her home from a school function. I wonder who that guy is and which candidate he supports.
6. John McWhorter asks if Romney is a race-baiter. As I’m realizing with much of McWhorter’s stuff, it’s soft, mushy-mouthed, and inconclusive.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Could you imagine a ghetto black version of Jersey Shore ever being produced? Just by showing reality it would be the most racist show ever conceived.
“single … mothers hold this country together.”
- Ann Romney in a GOP-approved convention speech
Is there a more pathetic organization in all of history than the Republican Party?
Bed, Bath and Beyond would be a terrible place to pick up women.
When you get women in a retail setting they can only focus on the products on shelf with that “glazed over” mesmerized zombie look. Only men would go to BBB looking for a sexual partner, women there aren’t thinking about meeting a mate – they are there quenching their need to shop and acquire things.
Well, they did have “Hot Ghetto Mess” on BET for 6 episodes, didn’t they? hosted by Charlie Murphy
Comment copied from your earlier discussion on the “dog whistle” issue.
The left use NAMs as a weapon.
They vote the way progressives want them to vote in exchange for the cash prizes of being progressive clients.
They are trained from childhood to behave in a savage manner. Have you ever wondered exactly why progressives are so uniformly in favor of school policies that undercut teacher authority to impose classroom order? It’s so that the students are properly trained to disrupt authority whenever they encounter it. Effect 1: the students grow up to be dangerous to be around – result? They’re effective foot soldiers to ethnically cleanse dangerous whites (especially when the law doesn’t apply to them but does apply to the wrong type of whites). Effect 2: they grow up to be unemployable – result? They have no alternative to being progressive clients.
Of course, all this isn’t explicit – it just “happens”. Progressive ideology is constantly being refined to approach progressive perfection – one that fully benefits the upper portion of the upper and lower vs middle and fully destroys the middle portion. They know full well exactly what kind of savagery they’re creating – it’s not like anyone with any thoughtfulness could miss the destruction of Detroit but the important part is to never explicitly state the actual ideology.
Hmm, never stating your actual ideology but at the same time communicating it when you fully control the narrative… I wonder what such coded communication would be like? It would require sending messages that sound innocuous to people who are on the wrong side, can be mentally processed as being innocuous to the members of the upper part of the coalition and at the same time clearly communicating to the lower portion of the coalition that they’re free to commit crimes as long as the victims are the right type*. This is pretty complex. You’d have to craft a message that actually says three different things and each group can only hear the message that they’re intended to hear.
I wonder what you’d call such a communication style?
* Of course the lower members aren’t expected to be able to distinguish between uppers and middles – don’t worry though! The uppers will figure out how to maintain total physical isolation from the lowers. Then the lowers can simply act on the identifying trait of the middles and uppers – race.
I fully agree that the MSM, as in journalists and media pundits, loves to denigrate and mock white trash while conspicuously avoiding doing so for ghetto blacks.
But reality TV is absolutely full of horribly-behaving black people. For the commenter asking about a “ghetto version of Jersey Shore” – has he watched Vh1, especially Flavor of Love and its offshoots, in the past 5 or 6 years?
@PA
Oh wow, did she really say that?
PA:
““single … mothers hold this country together.”
- Ann Romney in a GOP-approved convention speech”
the day of the rope cannot come soon enough.
Full quote excerpt. The Stupid Party indeed.
At least they didn’t send out a supplicant man to kiss the collective rim of America’s Best (this time). It was foolish though; no women are sitting on the fence, waiting for just the right color of sunshine blown up their ass, to swing their votes.
Pingback: Evolution: its own refutation | Gene Expression | Discover Magazine
Good Lord Ann Romney said that? It used to be multimillionares had a little bit of humility about them, frankly I read this and don’t see much of a difference between Ann Romney and Honey Boo Boos mother.
I was already planning to vote against Romney, since the Republican Party is going out of their way, I’ll have to vote against the Republican party in general, these people are either evil or stupid to the core.
Jesus, how offensive can she get? She could start talking about Jesus I guess.
My guess is the other guy didn’t have much invested in Ann and it was no big deal if Mitt wanted her. High school age dance, male and female participants went to different single sex schools, could well have been a blind date or something like a blind date.
The Republican Party is a classic example of beta. In talking about the GOP convention, Lawrence Auster described Republicans as decent but clueless business types, utterly unequipped against a total-war-mindset Democratic Party machine.
The numbers-crunches, probably correctly, determined that women voters — unmarried white women in particular — are key to getting Romney elected. Alas, GOP leadership runs with this data like a beta suitor to the flower shop, thinking that he can flatter his date into putting out. How does that normally work out?
As Larry Auster pointed out, it’s kind of unnecessary for wives to campaign for their husbands. Ann Romney is an intelligent person, but the more you talk, the more you say dumb things.
Pingback: Evolution: its ideological own refutation | Biology News by Biologged
And not only do single mothers not hold the country together, they are a huge drain on it.
I see plenty of attractive women at BBB. They are all dragging around bored-looking fiancees.
There’s a lot to argue with in McWhorter’s article. However, he is still more reasonable than most black people, who it sounds like he was speaking to.
Last night one of my cats left a yellow puddle and a pile of turds next to the cat box. Would the Democrats like a video?
Pingback: Evolution: its ideological own refutation | Gene Expression | BizNax
“Could you imagine a ghetto black version of Jersey Shore ever being produced? Just by showing reality it would be the most racist show ever conceived”
There already is a ghetto black version of Jersey Shore: Hardcore Pawn — about a pawn shop in Detroit. It’s one of my favorite shows. My favorite “characters” are the crazy-ass customers (mostly black) who patronize the shop, and the cast-iron bitch who helps her father run the place.
The show has been successful enough to inspire at least two other spin-offs: Hardcore Pawn: Chicago, and CombatPawn .