As commenter stonerwithaboner points out, Amanda Marcotte popped up in the comments section of a post at Feministe about a woman who was worried that she’d raped her boyfriend. The scenario:
I accidentally raped my boyfriend. What happened was I awoke to find my boyfriend rubbing up against me. After a little while, he pulled my hand, motioning for me to get on top of him to have sex, as he has done many times before. I obliged, and all was well, until he apparently woke up and pushed me off of him. I did not have any indication that he was asleep, since he was an active participant the entire time and was NOT lying there like a dead fish. In the morning, he expressed his displeasure about being woken up with sex. He said that he felt really violated. I apologized and explained my understanding of the situation. Now he says he feels really weird about what happened and he can’t stomach me touching him. What should I do?
Marcotte responded in comments and was taken to task by many other commenters:
It’s…..possible that he was asleep.
The likelier possibility is he was awake the whole time and lying about it in order to screw with her sense of reality. Additionally, he can make her feel both guilty and humiliated, putting him in a Position of power over her.
Gas lighting is the likelier explanation. Yes, it’s a weird, elaborate mind fuck, but hey, it’s not weirder than the guy whose girlfriend wrote to Captain Awkward because he’s controlling and humiliating her by not letting her use their bathroom.
I’m sure we can all spot the double-standard here. Marcotte must always be tied to the national incident which made her famous. She supported the lying filthy skank/stripper/murderer Crystal Mangum against the white Duke lacrosse players accused of raping her.
Like this:
Like Loading...
I totally get your point and agree, but…WTF. That’s some weird shit. Who are these fuckups?
Projection. The idea that a false rape accusation could be used as a tool of manipulation within a relationship. Until I read that comment of hers over at Toy Soldier, the thought never even occurred to me.
It’s how Marcotte’s own mind works.
“putting him in a Position of power over her.”
Why did she capitalize a random word in her sentence?
I think the story is B.S. and is being used for meaningless debate. Reality: No man with morning wood is going to turn away poonani. UNLESS, his girlfriend, wife, etc.. is repulsive.
Nothing new here. Feminists in Israel fought against gender-neutral interpretations of sex crime laws for the same reason — fear that women might suffer from false accusations.
It’s not that feminists believe defendants in rape cases shouldn’t have systemic protections in place to deal with false accusations; it’s that they believe that only women should receive these protections.
Amanda Marcotte is a vacuous stupid cunt.
Duh!
So if Man Jaw has any consistency she must admit that a woman claiming rape has put herself in a position of power over a man.
But she is a stupid cunt so will not.
Misandry is a word that is probably a bit over used by anti-feminists, but Marcotte clearly displays it here.
But these people have such hang-ups over sex. There was no malice aforethought in the woman’s actions, and no reasonable person could possibly consider her actions as rape. The fact that her boyfriend feels “violated” shows you what a pathetic individual he is.
There is a related female-on-male rape scene at the beginning of “The World According to Garp”. The ur-feminist character is a nurse caring for WWII soldiers in a hospital and sits on a comatose vet who has a permanent erection caused by a spine injury. The story’s protagonist played by a young Robin Williams is conceived.
“No man with morning wood is going to turn away poonani. UNLESS, his girlfriend, wife, etc.. is repulsive.”
well, for every hot girl in the world there is a man who is tired of banging her.
There was this sexual-relations documentary where a guy resented his over-sexed girlfriend who would get on top of him in the morning. Rape wasn’t used.
Marcotte’s crime would always be the horrendous racism she perpetrated in her book
http://dearwhitefeminists.wordpress.com/update/
Marcotte deleted one of her most inflammatory blog posts about the Duke lacrosse scandal. Here is what she wrote:
“…In the meantime, I’ve been sort of casually listening to CNN blaring throughout the waiting area and good fucking god is that channel pure evil. For awhile, I had to listen to how the poor dear lacrosse players at Duke are being persecuted just because they held someone down and fucked her against her will—not rape, of course, because the charges have been thrown out. Can’t a few white boys sexually assault a black woman anymore without people getting all wound up about it? So unfair.”
I got this from the leftie Web site Daily Kos, where a blogger found it in a cache file and took some crap for it. The blogger deserves praise for this and we should continually like to it and constantly mention her LIBELOUS DELETED POST. Here’s the link:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/02/02/297671/-The-Edwards-Marcotte-Fiasco
First commandment of “feminism?”
Thou shall be like “devout” dyke.
A stupid question gets a stupid answer, which Amanda was happy to provide.
Is there a more vile mainstream cunt than Amanda Marcotte?
sounds like an obvious troll letter to me, well executed too, that stupid whore marcotte fell for it and made herself look completely bat shit insane
@DB – you are generally correct about men and morningwood, EXCEPT in the case of this young, fledgling Mangina who has internalized the lies of feminism to the point where he thinks that Feminists might approve of a MAN who barges his way into Our Sisters of The Perpetual Rape under the assumption that If a woman can be slightly raped, then a man might be, too.
Even worse is idea that the unwitting rapist waif herself would actually buy into this same notion to the point where she would write to an advice columnist for clarification of her rapy ways.
Maharlotte’s notion that the victim (dude) was faking to prove some sort of a point is a clear confession that reversing the genders in this situation would be NO “legitimate” rape, either.
At least the victims of real, brutal, random jump-out-of-the-bushes rape can take comfort in the fact that the feminists think that a real rape’s actual physical and emotional distruction of a real victim is somehow equivalent to sleepy morningwood sexy time between established bedmates. Same thing, same thing. Rape is rape, dontchaknow.
BTW, rape me like that, anytime you want, beloved – yawn! Sleepytime.
And that is what the Bibo Sez.
Bless you!
“No man with morning wood is going to turn away poonani. UNLESS, his girlfriend, wife, etc.. is repulsive.”
The fags might disagree.
Really though, how pathetic the enslavement and weakness implied by this thought. It’s bestial.
When you wake up with a hard on without a woman to have sex with, do you masturbate?
Second commandment of “feminism.”
Thou shall hate man, woman and child.
Third commandment of “feminism.”
Thou shall convince the MRM that woman is a very icky creature.
Anyone who ever thought that feminism as practiced by the Marcotte crowd was nothing but a cynical ploy for female power without any attempt at balance, honesty or fairness was a fool.
Marcotte has repeatedly demonstrated that if all men fell under a bus, she’d be, at best, unconcerned. In her view all men are evil perpetrators, and even if a particular man is not guilty of or Y, he’s guilty simply by virtue of being male. Therefore, the Duke Lacrosse victims were guilty because they were male and they had sex with a woman – full stop. Her consent was irrelevant.
On a larger point, she’s been consistent with her general support for women in all situations where they need to square off with any man; she makes no attempt to hide it. In her book, maleness is a crime.
She demonstrates this with every single word she writes. She’s thoroughly consistent.
Saying she engages in misandry is like saying water is wet.
She doesn’t even claim to pretend to be unbiased; she dislikes men, maleness, almost everything associated with male culture, and thinks that woman should always get the benefit of the doubt – or simply be supported in any conflict due to the historical burden that was traditionally put on them.
I’m guessing that men can work off their collective debt to women by, say, submitting to absolute female judgment on every possible issue for about 10,000 years, without ever expressing an opinion or makign any decision until women feel they have been properly repaid.
Aside from that, expecting Marcotte to stop writing the way she does is absurd. It’s part and parcel of what she believes. She’s in a holy war against the evil conspiracy of Patriarchy.
It’s like the jihad against Israel. An individual 12-year-old Israeli buying ice cream may be innocent, but All Israelis Are Infidel Jews and Therefore Are Guilty By Association. For her, class analysis comes first: People aremembers of categories, and are only incidentally individuals.
I’ll bet that she thinks that it’s justified for Arab Muslims to loathe all Jews, a general hatred of amorphous Jewishness, as well. I’m almost certain she thinks Israelis are all guitly as sin and deserve to be run into the sea.
her entire worldview is likely poisoned by retrograde, second-rate Marxist analysis.
Even if the Duke Lacrosse vicims were completely innocent of the charges brought against them, and Marcotte’s abject silence since then is tantamount to her admission of this, it surely doesn’t matter to her. They are guilty of being Male, of having Sex with a Woman, of Abusing the Concept of Femaleness by having sex the way they did, and of being all-around Jerks.
As such, in her book, they deserve to be in prison for a charge. What the actual charge is is irrelevant: They are guilty, full stop. if need be, make something up and make it stick.
She was just angry at being called out for her visceral male-hatred. Lots of people have called her out on it.
Who could possibly hate the man more than the devout dyke?
Fourth commandment of “feminism.”
Thou shall see to it that not a single person notices “feminism” contains not one scintilla of femininity.
Marcotte’s crime would always be the horrendous racism she perpetrated in her book
http://dearwhitefeminists.wordpress.com/update/
——–
hahahaha, someone tell the $PLC that Amanhater is a racist too, gotta love the “progressive lefties”-if you graduated from the “right” school and say the “right” things some of the time, you can be a totally reprehensible human being and no one will call you out for your hate speech or putt you on a list of “hate sites.” Man, that Goldwater guy must be like David Fatrelle, gotta bow down to the manhaters and maybe, just maybe they might get laid….
At least a shithead like Ryu is honest about his hate. And that’s the only good thing I’ve got to say about him….
Signed,
A “victim of miscegenation”
and thanks for mentioning me in your post Chuck!
great thread here
https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/its-not-rape-if-a-woman-does-it/
What the letter writer described isn’t rape because there was reasonable belief in consent.I doubt the letter is real because if you’re having a sexual relationship with someone, then most guys would say she gets to jump on you in the morning unless you tell her in advance not to, and you don’t hassle her about it if you decide later you didn’t want her to.
If the letter is real, then what Marcotte is doing by her comments is creating tension and suspicion in someone else’s relationship just to further her own agenda. To me that’s evil.
Pingback: Are We Legend? | The Hunt
I’d like to sexualize Jane Seymour, and she’s an old broad.
sorry wrong thread, lol
Kinda reminiscent of that Schwyzer article about him being “concerned” that he raped his girlfriend by pursuing sex with her although she quietly participated and later complained that she hadn’t been in the mood for sex.
I used to date a girl who would ‘sleepfuck’. I can’t tell you how many times I would be awakened at 3am to find her riding me. I’d stay awake and we would fuck and in the morning she would never remember any of it. It was awesome.
“The fags might disagree.
Really though, how pathetic the enslavement and weakness implied by this thought. It’s bestial.
When you wake up with a hard on without a woman to have sex with, do you masturbate?”
Sometimes. Got to tame the wood. I wake up every day with a fine lady.
It finally happened.
Hairdressers have been searching high and low for years. Finally, they located someone with Amanda Marcotte’s haircut:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ex-professor-due-in-court-in-alabama-university-shooting-that-killed-3-people-wounded-3-more/2012/09/24/8fdfeeec-061b-11e2-9eea-333857f6a7bd_story.html
I wonder how they feel about Qaddafi’s rapescapades.
For that matter, have they thought about Mohammad’s claimed consummation of his marriage to a 9 year old girl?
Days of Broken Arrows-
I bet that Pharengula guy would say the evilllle patriarchy made her go on a killing spree, but when men do it, it is because they are baaaad……
I’m very dubious about this. Based on a book written by a French Jewish journalist from alleged eye witness reporting (mostly from the alleged victims).
It seems like every ‘bad guy’ that gets toppled anywhere in the West conveniently happens to be a massive pedophile and/or torture enthusiast. It’s all too “good” to be true for me.
I don’t have a hard time believing that Gadaffi was a bad dude, and generally a hardass, unsympathetic motherfucker, and this is plausibly true given the mold of the decadent Roman Emperors who actually did do shit like this. Seems like it is every single time though.
Which boogeyman of western civilization wasn’t also a verifiable sexual degenerate (excluding Hitler, who again Jewish academics and journalists claimed that he was but were later debunked). Even domestic ‘enemies’ that get busted for something legit always get additional time for kiddy porn. Every single time.
The problem with asking those females in the West who have embraced devout dyke “nature” to answer the question of Qadafi’s alleged serial raping is that their total lack of chatter amongst each other over the allegations is all the answer we need. They don’t care about WOMEN, here or abroad. Asking the question simply gives them the opportunity for another obligatory soiling of “men” as though Qadafi’s degenerate ways were somehow indicative of the ways of Western white man. Of course, if asked to comment on the allegations, what would they say? Their silence to no questions speaks volumes. After all, they should have been onto Qadafi’s evil ways before the rest of us, no?
I wonder how they feel about Qaddafi’s rapescapades.
I’m very dubious about this. Based on a book written by a French Jewish journalist from alleged eye witness reporting (mostly from the alleged victims).
But he did have the female bodyguards all the time, though. That leads me to believe that he could’ve really been doing the orgy stuff mentioned by others.
I can’t understand the guy in this story. An ex woke me up once with sex and it was so great we made a game of it for a few months. One trying to see how far we could get with the other before wake up. Realizing through the haze of morning confusion that you’re in the middle of getting a BJ is still one of my favorite memories about that girl.
He doesn’t feel comfortable getting touched anymore? That guy has been mind fucked by somebody in a major way.
Pingback: Linkage Is Good For You: Septemberish | Society of Amateur Gentlemen