Will there be election day riots if Mitt Romney wins? Liberals like to denigrate anyone who asks this question, but in the back of their minds they know it’s a distinct possibility, and they’re probably also perplexed that nobody is worried that conservatives will riot in the streets even if Romney loses.
Walter Williams addressed this back in February, and it’s been sitting in the back of everyone’s mind probably since President Obama was first elected. Everyone has just been sitting around waiting for someone else to say it so that they can be labeled a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist. The thing about the race riot charge is that it could work both ways.
Ann Coulter believes that white liberals stoke fears of black riots in order to get whites to vote for liberal candidates. Liberals believe that conservatives demagogue this in order to scare whites to the polls. The two ideologies have different theories about how conservatives will respond to the fear of race riots.
Local police will certainly be on watch, mostly in places like Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, and Richmond, Virginia. And because the police are prepared, riots are less likely be sparked. However, if critical mass is reached and a large riot ensues, it could spread throughout the country. Twitter will help.
I think that if Obama loses it will be worse than any singular riotous outburst. A deep, seething anger will cause many more isolated incidents of black-on-white violence. There won’t be a major riot to point to, but there will be an uptick in yobbery stretched out over several months which will just be swept under the rug by the mainstream media. Unless attackers shout “That’s for Obama,” these stories will be eraced in typical fashion.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Just remember, dig dis: De riots is whitie’s fault. Man!
Take a look at the NY Times demographic maps. Hate to live in a recently gentrified neighborhood. I still think Obama wins so we don’t have to see this, but if he does lose, I consider riots a lot probability event. Longshot odds, like 20-1.
That last line made me laugh. Blacks assaulting whites and facing jail time saying ‘that’s for obama’ would be comical considering he’s pretended all his adult life to be black to take advantage of the system. They’d be acting out for a guy who never really was one of them but used them for self gain + the big money interests.
I’m wondering why they’re not rioting RIGHT NOW. After all, “hope and change” has been disastrous for the black community.
I would rather have Obama card off the table and take the 4 damage.
i love the smell of burning ghetto in the morning. smells like… a do-over.
That’s nothing compared to the Mormon rioting that will occur if Romney loses. Utah will be in flames – as will elite prep schools and private equity firms everywhere.
The funny thing would be Obama winning, then blacks rioting in November, 2016 because they’re too stupid/ignorant to realize that there’s a two-term limit.
“That’s nothing compared to the Mormon rioting that will occur if Romney loses. Utah will be in flames – as will elite prep schools and private equity firms everywhere.”
But aren’t all “religious extremists” the same? I mean. Muslim, Mormon – they both start with M.
Is anyone else secretly hoping for widespread riots if Romney wins?
And yet the dirty little secret is that the radical “black” collective can muster and justify any reason to riot, WIN, LOSE or DRAW.
All conversation with the American “black” individual absolutely starts with, “What WILL YOU DO to “liberate” from white Supremacy? WILL YOU USE any means necessary? WILL YOU USE any memes necessary?”
They can riot in victory or they can riot in defeat. That’s radical autonomy and it defines the state of the radical “black” collective and evidences an “ANY MEANS NECESSARY” mentality.
When the war of words ends? What war begins?
im not participating. Is chuck still working at applebee’s?
So I take it the whole point is to scare skittish white Independents and other fence-sitters into voting for Obama?
No… The point is that the radical “black” collective can do what it wants, when it wants and for whatever reason it wants. Period. And it will almost certainly pay no real price for any of its actions.
The effectiveness of this threat on voting depends on the gender.
It makes white men more stubborn in voting for Romney, but it probably does persuade some white WOMEN to vote for Obama. Except for the occasional Mama Grizzly, most white women wilt and start to cry when confronted with the prospect of violence. So a Dem dirty trickster would be smart to direct a whisper campaign about “riots” towards married women.
Look how the right-of-center blogger Ann Althouse started getting the vapors when questions were raised about Obama’s flirtations with black radicals.
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/152542/
I’m increasingly of the mind that the biggest, by far, reason why blacks get so much leeway and gibsmedats in Western countries is pity. It’s a pity that comes from the European man’s hindbrain. A few days ago I explained this pity, referring among other things to European missionaries encountering the African, and whites applauding a black-promoting scene in “Batman Begins.”
Things like machiavellian elites, Whiskey’s assertions about women, those are overstated. It’s good old white guilt, more accurately called white pity. It’s why David Alexander and Obsidian were so indulged by Roissy’s commenters for so long, including by me.
If the first black man in the White House didn’t set all of the white folks with doomsday stockpiles of guns into race war mode I doubt his reelection will amount to much.
Anti-Racist you will help the Soldiers who follow you quietly put more Men Of Dark Color in position of stomping over racist power structures.
If you read history carefully you’ll discover that blacks primarily riot when they’re given power and concessions. In case you have noticed we’ve had small scale rioting everywhere since Obama was elected. The very night of the election a group of whites were beat on their own porch by a mob of black celebrating Obama victory. They told the whites it’s now a black world and a black man now owns them. You should also note that areas that have mostly black control have a great deal more of this rioting than areas where blacks don’t feel welcome. It’s a tribal reaction to weakness and not reaction to the insult of whites not voting for a black person.
Gucc…just remember in the past four years sales of gun and ammunition have increased greatly. Believe me, these people are prepared to take on any “rioters” with extreme prejudice.
PA,
It’s why David Alexander and Obsidian were so indulged by Roissy’s commenters for so long, including by me.
David Alexander was pretty harmless, and had no ego of his own… He openly said he was inferior to whites, for Christ’s sake.
The bigger nuisance was Chic Noir…. while she had a lot less debate stamina than Obsidian, her views were arguably worse.
Then again, what we see here is another WhiteKnight Nationalist unwilling to hold a woman, even a black woman, to the same standard as black men…
Under no standard can David Alexander be rated as as much of a racist troll as Chic Noir.
Look inward, PA, to understand why you still cut women too much slack, and why Novaseeker calls you a WhiteKnight.
blacks are cowards with no balls, they are just talking shit because they are scared and impotent
a black riot because of an obama loss would be the best possible thing that could happen
I suspect that at this point, a lot of black people are thinking “We’re owed”, and if they don’t get to collect, or worse – if they’re rebuffed – before they get what they feel what they’re owed by everyone else, then the anger will come out. It will feel like a rejection of their core demands, and at that point, it’s time to bring out the big guns.
its possible. but then again, there were no riots in 2000, even though many blacks felt their votes had been stolen.
“David Alexander was pretty harmless, and had no ego of his own… He openly said he was inferior to whites, for Christ’s sake”
David Alexander was a nice guy but he was full of racial obsessions. He advocated things like daughters of all whites but the top 15% be bred with blacks and that whites whittle themselves to a tiny elite devoted to uplifting blacks. He saw whites as little more than feed for blacks.
His attitude though is exactly what blacks feel toward whites — a sense of inferiority driven by envy. This feeling is the fatal complement of the white’s pity for the black. Hence our liberalism, indulgence and gibsmedats.
The modern liberated black cloaks his envy with aggression and posturing, but it’s still DA underneath.
“WhiteKnight Nationalist”
The white-knight WN is a mirror image of the half-fag MRA
I think it’s very possible they will riot if Obama loses, and we should be prepared for. I don’t want to watch another Reginald Denny situation, knowing it could have been prevented. All urban police officers should be working, as well as having the National Guard on alert. White people need to stay out of black areas on election night.
White women are probably most exalted in non-white majority countries. White women certainly don’t put each other on a pedestal, and if there are enough of us, white men don’t either.
Nice to see this blog taking the In Mala Fide route…
Care to explain?
@Lara: “White people need to stay out of black areas on election night.”
White people need to stay out of black areas period.
I’m not going to let blacks scare me into voting for someone who failed at accomplishing anything in his first term. What ever happened to let the best candidate win? If blacks want to riot, I say let them, myself and countless others have been stockpiling guns and ammo for years so Let’s get it on!
@BT, I agree with you, no one is going to scare me into voting for a president. That has failed his people in almost every area. In reference to being scared if black people are going to riot, I am scared to death. In addition, I live in an area of the city that is being gentrified or so some liberals call it genocide. Therefore, we still have far more black people in our district than white people, and the prospect of riots is frightening.
However, I am going to that voting booth on Tuesday and vote for Romney in hopes the black people will realize he is the best choice. Living in an area where I am still outnumbered by black people has never been scary to me until this year. Moreover, it’s partly Obama’s fault due to his attempt to encourage class warfare.
For those of you black and white who’ll write in negative comments about me living in an urban neighborhood (This is what I have to say to you, you’d better be happy people like me are here already because if Obama is reelected). You will see gas prices more than $4 a gallon, groceries will go up, and all of our daily staples of life will cost far more, and force some of you back to the city.
There is one more thing, I am a log cabin republican (look it up for those of you who do not know what it means). However, I am not dumb enough to vote for Obama thinking he will really do anything for me, but make life far more difficult to live by taking more of my income in taxes etc. Furthermore, in reference to me being a log cabin republican I cannot wait to read some of your ignorant responses (note I typed some). You do not have to be an upper middle class white man, married with 2.1 children, living in the suburbs to be smart enough to know Romney would be the best person for the job. You can be an urban log cabin republican, and still realize he would be the best one for America as a whole.
Bring it on‼!